Its gradually emerged in recent months that the Food and Drug Administration not only spied on its employees, but did so on a massive scale collecting tens of thousands of employee emails to one another, as well as to journalists, members of Congress and congressional staff workers. The FDA also intercepted draft statements to the Office of Special Counsel, which investigates complaints of whistleblower harassment and reprisal. This monitoring, authorized by the agencys chief counsel, was clearly a deliberate policy of the highest levels of FDA leadership.
So what problem was all the surveillance directed against? Embezzling? Sexual harassment? No. The FDA was out to punish whistleblowers for talking out of school about dangerous radiation levels in medical imaging devices approved by FDA for mammograms and colonoscopies.
Thats right. FDA leadership was out to prevent employees from talking to members of Congress which the civics books tell us safeguards the public safety and welfare by, among other things, creating regulatory agencies like the FDA about the very kinds of concerns the FDA was allegedly created to address. Continue reading


March 24, 2009
FAIR USE NOTICE:
People want to trust that their so-called elected government is doing the right thing when it passes regulations to enhance public safety. When the Pure Food and Drug Act was passed in 1906 a new watchdog agency, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), was born. It would be many years before we as a nation had such luxuries as refrigeration, sanitary food processing standards, and good manufacturing processes (GMP), so in many respects, this law was necessary. So, what exactly does the FDA do?
It is time that the actions of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) speak for themselves and Americans began to question their own absorbent use and blind-loyalty to FDA approved drugs. If not, you too may become a FDA statistic. The FDA’s financial ties to “big-pharma” have caused millions of preventable deaths over the last 30 years.
Surely at one time or another, you have heard the expression, “Noblesse Oblige,” usually bandied about by some liberal as justification for yet another entitlement program. The meaning of the phrase has been bastardized by the Kennedy clan to read, “To whom much is given, much is expected,” which is taken from the Gospel of Luke. Translated from the French, “Noblesse Oblige,” is closer to “Rank has its obligations.” Perhaps there is no real difference. 
