Unanswered questions frustrate Utahns, others
Across the country, local health departments, faced with a public outcry, are scrambling to discover whether serious diseases are linked to Defense Department activities.
While cancer clusters have been located around various defense stations, health organizations have failed to prove the diseases are connected to the military.
Three similar cases have earned particular scrutiny: Continue reading
(Except that Kelley found the TRUE cure 40 Years Ago!)
NOTE: And they call REAL researchers quacks? What utter nonsense. Let’s get realistic folks – the Medical Complex around the world just doesn’t really want the “War” on cancer to be won; for if they did – they would stop wasting print space with this kind of nonsense and begin to pay attention to what works! (Ed.)
EARLY tests of a revolutionary drug and radiation cancer treatment invented by British scientists have proved dramatically successful, it was revealed yesterday.
Laboratory mice genetically engineered to grow human tumours were completely cured in 85 per cent of cases. Continue reading
LYON, France (AP) – Eating lots of preserved meats such as salami, bacon, cured ham and hot dogs could increase the risk of bowel cancer by 50 percent, early results of a major new study have suggested.
However, when it came to fresh red meat – beef, lamb, pork and veal – there seemed to be no link.
Previous studies have linked high meat intake to colorectal cancer, but almost all the studies grouped fresh and processed meats together.
The latest findings come from an ongoing study experts say is the most reliable research into the influence of diet on cancer to date – an investigation involving almost half a million people, from southern Greece to northern Norway. However, that does not mean red meat has been cleared of suspicion, said Dr. Arthur Schatzkin, chief of nutritional epidemiology at the U.S. National Cancer Institute. Continue reading
Despite decades of searching, scientists are still struggling to find a cure for cancer. And though some conventional treatments can slow the spread of the disease, many are highly toxic and have harsh side effects. So it’s no surprise that six of 10 people with the disease try some form of alternative (also called complementary) therapy, according to a survey by scientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which was published in the May 2000 issue of the journal Oncology Nursing Forum.
Partly because so many patients are turning to alternative approaches, mainstream researchers are beginning to put these unproven therapies to the test in carefully controlled studies. Here are some of the most promising currently being investigated:
PC-SPES
What it is: A mixture of eight Chinese herbs purported to treat prostate cancer.
Summary: There’s preliminary but promising evidence that it works. Continue reading
NOTE: Once again, our View from the other side shows the ignorance of the medical community and their reluctance to bear witness to the TRUTH!
Notice the intent to scare the reader from the alternative – and back into the waiting operating rooms of your friendly physician! (Ed.)
After more than 17 years of battling malignant melanoma, Nick Steiner knew he had few options left. Steiner, 65, is a physician himself. Diagnosed with this deadly form of skin cancer in 1980, he’d watched the tumors spread into his lungs and then into his brain. He’d tried everything medicine has to offer – from surgery to an experimental cancer-fighting vaccine. When the disease surged back again in 1997, he recalls, “It looked like I was at the end of the road.”
Desperate, he turned to something he might once have scoffed at: Chinese herbs. “I heard about an herbal expert named George Wong. I gave him a call, knowing I had nothing to lose.” Continue reading
The world’s leading health organisation has withheld from publication a study which shows that not only might there be no link between passive smoking and lung cancer but that it could even have a protective effect.
The astounding results are set to throw wide open the debate on passive smoking health risks. The World Health Organisation, which commissioned the 12-centre, seven-country European study has failed to make the findings public, and has instead produced only a summary of the results in an internal report. Continue reading
NOTE: The following article was recently published for Reason magazine. While there are several comments, which we agree with, I am saddened to say that this author has been greatly misdirected by the American Cancer Society and the National Institute for Health. It is only too typical of the Common Enemy to mislead, misdirect and post outright lies to the American public – all in the guise of being “politically correct” – and this writer is only being used as a tool.
At the bottom of this page, please read Dr. Kelley’s response to the nonsense being perpetrated. (Ed.) Continue reading