Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant Deadly Scam

The HPV vaccine controversy has got many people confused. Here’s what you need to know. The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a very common virus that is transmitted via sexual contact. Symptoms aren’t always apparent and someone can be a carrier without knowing it. The virus, like influenza, will usually go away on its own. If the immune system is not working optimally, however, the virus can linger, causing genital warts. There is also evidence that extended exposure to the virus can cause cancer of the cervix, vagina, anus, rectum, mouth, throat, penis, and vulva.

HPV Vaccine Controversy
Vaccinations have been developed to prevent infection of HPV and in recent years campaigns to promote vaccination have escalated. The two most popular vaccines are Gardasil (made by Merck) and Cervarix (made by GlaxoSmithKline). Aggressive vaccination programs of teenage children (girls and boys) have been instituted worldwide. The uptake of these programs has been lower than expected and the safety of these vaccinations is being questioned.

Drs. Genevieve Rail of Concordia University and Abby Lippmann of McGill University in Montreal, Quebec were awarded a grant to research the safety and efficacy of Gardasil in preventing HPV infection. Before submitting the official results of their research for publication, they authored an op-ed piece in the Quebec newspaper Le Devoir entitled, “HPV Vaccination: Urgent Call for a Moratorium”. This exposé rocked the vaccination world.

A Sensitive Subject
Rail and Lippmann were slammed by colleagues and the mainstream media because they were paid to research, not condemn. Their research was conducted over a four-year period; part of the study included interviews with parents, some of whom reported their children experienced serious side effects after vaccination.

“I’m sort of raising a red flag, out of respect for what I’ve found in my own study, and for the despair of parents who had totally perfect 12-year-olds who are now in their beds, too tired to go to school. Yes, we’re going against the grain, and we are going against those who are believed, i.e., doctors and nurses and people in public health.”

Here are the primary reasons why the scientists so strongly spoke against HPV vaccinations:

1. Absence of informed consent – the potential side effects of the vaccines are not disclosed to parents, nor are the benefits of the vaccine (which researchers question).

2. Serious adverse reactions – some countries no longer recommend them due to the high risk of serious adverse reactions.

3. Deficient pharmacovigilance system – it was discovered that healthcare professionals have been withholding reports of adverse reactions, even (or especially) when severe.

4. False priority in public health – HPV vaccines are promoted to prevent cervical cancer. However, incidences of this type of cancer has been steadily declining (without the vaccine) worldwide due to pap tests.

5. Questionable causality – “the vast majority of girls and women who have high risk HPV do not develop cancer because HPV alone cannot cause cancer. Furthermore, in 90% of cases, the HPV disappear naturally from the body within the two years that follow an infection.”

6. Unproven efficacy – cervical cancer takes decades to develop—there are no studies yet possible that the vaccines work. In addition, Gardasil can increase the risk of precancerous lesions if it is administered to a woman who has already contracted the virus.

7. Fraudulent marketing – Gardasil is heavily advertised as being cancer preventive. However, there is no evidence that is true and there are no long-term clinical trials of the HPV vaccines.

8. Hasty approval – Gardasil was approved for general use before adequate clinical trials to prove its safety and effectiveness.

“Everywhere on the planet, vaccinated girls are the protagonists at the heart of a drama kept secret by pharmaceutical companies. At the least, our [Quebec] Health Minister should impose a moratorium so that independent research could be done on a vaccine suspected of causing very serious adverse reactions. Current studies are not independent or they use time criteria (too short) or symptom criteria (too restricted) that do not allow the detection of a majority of girls experiencing serious adverse reactions.”

Dr. Lucija Tomlijenovic gives a short review of the scientific literature around Gardasil and Cervarix below. As she concludes, studies performed by the pharmaceutical company don’t test for adverse reactions. “You’re not going to find what you’re not looking for,” she warns.

Other Conclusions
Even earlier than Rail and Lippmann, in 2009, lead Gardasil researcher Dr. Diane Harper began speaking out against HPV vaccinations for many of the same reasons. She pointed out that the same number of women in the United States who die from cervical cancer, die from HPV vaccines—but death as the result of the vaccine occurs at a much younger age. (4) She concedes that Gardasil is safe for most women and girls but informed consent regarding serious adverse side effects must be disclosed.

To further put the statistics into perspective: in the drug insert for Gardasil it’s noted that 3.3% of participants in the latest clinical trials experienced new autoimmune disorders after receiving the vaccine.

As of June 2015, 183 million doses of Gardasil have been administered worldwide. That means that over 6 million people (mostly women and girls) may potentially suffer debilitating, chronic disease as a result of the HPV vaccine. In 2012, there were approximately 525,000 new cases of cervical cancer reported worldwide (5).

The vaccine risk is more than eleven times that of cancer.

A Danish study in 2015 documented an array of “sympathetic nervous system dysfunction” symptoms resulting from HPV vaccinations and called for urgent research (6). Plus, serious post-vaccination illness has been reported in Ireland. Subsequently, routine administration of the HPV vaccines has been withdrawn in Japan due to adverse reactions.

What’s Really Going On?
In an open letter to the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), physician and scientist Sin Hang Lee asserts:

“I write to present grave concerns regarding the conduct of certain members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), the World Health Organization, the CDC and other scientific/health professionals during the time shortly before the public hearing on HPV Vaccine Safety which was held in Tokyo, Japan on February 26, 2014. I have come into possession of documentation which leads me to believe multiple individuals and organizations deliberately set out to mislead Japanese authorities regarding the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix®, which were being promoted at that time.”

The letter then goes on to name names and provide specific evidence of fraud regarding the marketing, use, efficacy, and the withholding of reports of adverse effects of the HPV vaccines.

The most reported negative reactions to Gardasil and Cervarix are:

• Chronic and prolonged muscle and joint pain
• Fatigue
• Headaches
• Immobility
• Postural tachycardia syndrome – chronic condition in which overwhelming headaches, dizziness, fainting, heart palpitations, and nausea occur when standing
• Rashes
• Seizures
• Swelling
• Difficulty with vision

Other reactions:

• Anaphylaxis
• Encephalomyelitis (inflammation of brain and spinal cord)
• Food intolerance
• Irregular menses/early menopause
• Multiple sclerosis
• Noise sensitivity
• Death

The United States Department of Health and Human Services has paid out in settlements almost $6,000,000 to forty-nine victims of damage caused by the HPV vaccines, including two deaths.

The controversy surrounding HPV vaccines is well founded. Regardless of what your doctor tells you or what the school district pushes you into accepting, when the risk far outweighs the potential—and largely unproven—benefit, there is only one best choice.

Researched by and written for Daily Health Post ~ December 6, 2016.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml