Someone with proper know-how on the subject is finally doing what should have been done years ago, as legal redress for the many crimes against humanity that continue to be inflicted against the American people by bought-off health officials and corrupt drug corporations.

Washington state attorney James Robert Deal, J.D., having thoroughly witnessed the incredible damage caused by FDA-approved vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs, is bravely taking the federal government to task for conspiring with drug and vaccine interests to push dangerous, unproven medical interventions on children, causing many of them to develop chronic illnesses or to die.

An expert in the legal process, Deal has developed quite the thorough list of legal arguments that he says serve as a template for suing – and beating – both Big Pharma and the federal government for their malfeasance in betraying American citizens with lies and misinformation about the alleged merits of vaccination.

His clear-cut plan is extensively laid out, and draws from legal precedence that stands to indict the federal government for criminal activity for its “mandatory,” state-sponsored vaccination programs.

Any attempt by the government to invoke state-sponsored, compulsory vaccination represents a “highly dangerous and deadly criminal enterprise,” Deal says, and he’s developed a surefire way for citizens in every state in the union to sue any and all government officials who attempt to harm our children with mandatory vaccine jabs.

“No entity under the sun has the right or lawful authority to arrogate [claim, appropriate or misappropriate] power unto itself to harm or injure, sicken or infect, paralyze or kill the people of this nation,” says Deal, warning that such behavior is a direct breach of the social contract the federal government has with citizens.

“Not only is such conduct by the state a serious breach of the social contract, it represents a profound violation of the public trust. Vaccination programs therefore break the inviolable bond between the citizenry and the government.”

You can read Deal’s full report and plan for dealing with the forced vaccination problem HERE.

GMOs, Roundup (glyphosate), smart meters, fluoride and vaccines all violate the public trust

Deal is no idiot, and his many other efforts in Washington state have made incredible headway in the defense of other freedom issues. Deal has unearthed considerable legal precedent for defending local municipalities that choose to ban genetically modified organisms (GMOs) from being cultivated within their geographical boundaries, for instance, which the federal government has repeatedly attempted to override.

Deal has also spoken out against the dangers of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, which he’s witnessed being prayed in suburban areas around Seattle. A much simpler and safer alternative to kill undesirable weeds is simple vinegar, he says.

Or how about those pesky “Smart” meters? Deal is against those, too – or at least power companies forcing their customers to use them, putting families and small children at risk.

Artificial water fluoridation is another freedom issue of concern to Deal, who says that the process leaches lead and other dangerous chemicals from piping and delivers it into people’s homes. And since fluoride itself has been proven to harm at least some people, forcing it on everyone via their tap water is a violation of the public’s right not to be poisoned by their own government.

“All drugs and all vaccines involve some risk which the CDC admits in its assurances that serious harm or death is rare,” Deal contends. “The connection between the fluoride scam and the vaccine scam [and all the other scams he’s spoken out about] is that they are both run by mega corporations without ethical standards.”

“We should not be afraid to follow the science where ever it logically goes and be outspoken on other contamina[nts], such as Roundup.”

Written by Ethan A. Huff, staff writer for Natural News, December 1, 2015.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www. law. cornell. edu/uscode/17/107. shtml